NanoVNA setup for common antenna system measurement tasks – scripting the setup

NanoVNA setup for common antenna system measurement tasks showed a display configuration better suited to those tasks.

It is tedious to set the display up using the device menu, and setups may vary with different NanoVNA hardware and firmware.

The firmware I used was NanoVNA.H.v1.2.20 which allows some setup using serial port commands. This article describes the technique.

The command used is the trace command

trace {0|1|2|3|all} [logmag|phase|delay|smith|polar|linear|swr|real|imag|r|x|z|zp|g|b|y|rp|xp|sc|sl|pc|pl|q|rser|xser|zser|rsh|xsh|zsh|q21] [src]
trace {0|1|2|3} [lin|log|ri|rx|rlc|gb|glc|rpxp|rplc|rxsh|rxser]
trace {0|1|2|3} {scale|refpos} {value}

For this exercise, I used Teraterm5 which allows setting delays after each character and after each line so that the NanoVNA is not overrun.

Above, the Teraterm serial port setup. Continue reading NanoVNA setup for common antenna system measurement tasks – scripting the setup

NanoVNA setup for common antenna system measurement tasks

A common task is an overall assessment of an antenna system, this article looks at NanoVNA display configuration that will often suit stand alone:

  1. measurement at any point on the feed line; and
  2. measurement with the reference plane, either by direct connection, fixture calibration or approximate calibration using e-delay.

Caution

When measuring an antenna system with the NanoVNA:

  • drain any static charge at the coax connector before offering the connector up to the NanoVNA; and
  • do not leave the instrument attached any longer than necessary to make the measurements.

Case 1: measurement at any point on the feed line

Since the phase relationship of the reflected wave at the point of observation relative to that at the feed point is unknown the only meaningful statistics are those based on the magnitude of s11 (|s11|), |s11|, ReturnLoss, and VSWR.

My NanovVNA does not offer a ReturnLoss plot natively, you could use |s11|dB remembering to multiply all values by -1 (ie ReturnLossdB=-|s11|dB.

Otherwise, the VSWR plot is most useful.

A Smith chart plot of s11 is sort of useful, but there is an unknown rotation from the feed point.

Since they are of no real value, you could disable traces 1, 2 and 3 to make the display less cluttered.

Case 2: measurement with the reference plane at the feed point, either by direct connection, fixture calibration or approximate calibration using e-delay

In this case, the phase of s11 is meaningful which means:

  • the Smith chart plot is properly presented wrt the chosen reference plane; and
  • R and X components of impedance can be properly calculated and presented.

An example

Let’s look at an example antenna sweep where the NanoVNA measurements are wrt the feed point (e-delay has been used as an approximate correction for a short feed line tail). The examples are from NanoVNA.H.v1.2.20 firmware.

Above is a screen capture, the colours are inverted for printing. Continue reading NanoVNA setup for common antenna system measurement tasks

Fazed by s11 phase magic?

The widespread takeup of the NanoVNA has given new life to the resonance myth. Heard on air some years ago was this enlightenment:

anyone who has blown across the top of an empty milk bottle and observed resonance knows that you really need a resonant antenna to fairly suck the power out of the transmitter.

Phase of s11

Let’s divert to the new pitch that phase of s11 equal to 0° is a key optimisation target.

Adapted to the NanoVNA is this capture from an instructional video:

The voice over is explaining that the (load) voltage and current are in phase at the cursor in this phase of s11 chart (check the axis title). The discussion asserts that phase=0° is goodness. Continue reading Fazed by s11 phase magic?

Google Bard on two wire line Zo

What’s that… the centre to centre distance is less than the round wire diameter… a physical impossibility… never mind, Google Bard can solve it!

Not only solve it, but warm you with a bit of humanistic chat to lend credibility to its answer.

This is worse than your average online expert on social media! A high tech automaton that is not fit for this purpose?

PS: I hope my doctor does not use Google Bard to recommend my treatments!

RF compensation of power relays – bigger relays

RF compensation of power relays referred to a video I have recently posted RF compensation of power relays.

Above, the example relay.

So, does this technique work for bigger relays?

Firstly, small is beautiful… it is easier to get good compensation of smaller relays over a wider frequency range.

Above is an example relay by K5UJ for discussion. I do not have measurement data for this relay box, but experience tells me that at HF, the compensation technique discussed above is likely to give good results for its intended purpose as a HF T/R relay. Continue reading RF compensation of power relays – bigger relays

Designing a Gamma Match – Simsmith design tool and confirmation of as-built antenna – comparison with Healey

A correspondent reading Designing a Gamma Match – Simsmith design tool and confirmation of as-built antenna referred me to (Healey 1969) and questioned my method.

I have tried several times to reconcile built and tuned antennas and NEC models with Healey and failed, leading me to think of the problem and devise a good approximation that did reconcile (for me).

This article attempts to reconcile the example given at Designing a Gamma Match – Simsmith design tool and confirmation of as-built antenna, an example where the two built antennas reconcile well with the ARRL published design article and NEC model.

Example for reconciliation

The example antennas are 4 element 144MHz Yagis built around 1970. They were originally designed with a 50Ω split dipole feed, or the option of a folded dipole with 4:1 half wave coax balun. Continue reading Designing a Gamma Match – Simsmith design tool and confirmation of as-built antenna – comparison with Healey

Transmission lines – forward and reflected phasors and the reflection coefficient

Let’s consider the following transmission line scenario:

  • Lossless;
  • Characteristic Impedance Zo=1+j0Ω; and
  • load impedance other than 1+j0Ω, and such that Vf=1∠0 and Vr=0.447∠-63.4° at this point.

The ratio Vr/Vf is known as the reflection coefficient, Γ. (It is also synonymous with S parameters S11, S22… Snn at the respective network ports.)

Above is a  phasor diagram of the forward and reflected voltages at the load. Continue reading Transmission lines – forward and reflected phasors and the reflection coefficient