Some time ago I wrote some articles on so-called Coax Traps, and an example design of an Inverted V dipole for 80 and 40m.
A coax trap (before cross connection).
The whole subject of trapped antennas elicits a lot of online discussion that is often more about semantics than understanding.
Some key points:
- It is impossible to wind a coil that does not exhibit self resonance at some frequency, and the assertion that it is adequately characterised as an ideal inductance in series with some resistance is quite wrong at frequency higher than say 10% of its self resonance frequency (SRF). So the distinction between a coil and a parallel resonant circuit is often misguided.
- A simplistic explanation of a trap is that it is designed to be resonant at the higher desired band of operation, and at that frequency it acts like an open switch disconnecting the outboard wire sections. You can make a trap that way but it has some significant disadvantages.
- The coax trap is a little more complicated that a fixed inductor tuned by a fixed capacitor.
A trapped dipole for 80m and 40m using bootstrap coax traps used a coax trap that is resonant at about 6.5MHz.
Zooming in a little, we can see that the traps have a modest inductive reactance at 80m (400 – 500Ω) and a largish -ve reactance around 40m (-4000 – -3000Ω). In concert with the wire length and configuration, this results in VSWR minima in the 80m and 40m band, fairly low structure loss, and a pattern largely like an Inverted V dipole of half wave length.
This design was built and tested, and worked pretty much to the model predictions. It demonstrates that a lot of notions about trapped dipoles are flawed.