OwenDuffy.net |
|
This article reports some observations using two common PC based audio spectrum analysis tools to analyse the strength of weak signals.
In all of these measurements, signal level was below the AGC threshold, so the receiver gain was fixed at maximum. If signals cause AGC gain compression, the analysis below does not necessarily apply.
In Stage 1 the receiver is connected to a standard signal generator. The signal generator was adjusted for 10dB SINAD at the receiver output using a Motorola 1012 SINAD meter. The Effective Noise Bandwidth of the receiver has been measured at 1450Hz (Measuring receiver bandwidth). Table 1 shows the calculated Noise Figure.
Quantity | Value | Comment |
SSG power | -124.5dBm | |
SINAD | 10dB | |
ENB | 1450Hz | |
NF | 8.3dB | |
S/N | 9.5dB |
Fig 1 shows the display in Spectrogram.
The Spectrogram analysis indicates signal level of -30dB, noise in 2.7Hz bandwidth adjacent to the signal of -62dB, so a S/N of 32dB.
Quantity | Value | Comment |
SSG power | -124dBm | |
S/N | 32dB | |
ENB | 2.7Hz | |
NF | 13.2dB |
The Noise Figure for the narrowband measurement around the carrier is quite different to the Noise Figure using the SINAD meter. The reason for this is the influence of the receiver audio response on the total audio noise power. Although the input noise power is broadband, and essentially flat across the receiver channel, the effect of the filtering and audio shaping is to reduce the contribution of higher audio frequencies to the total noise output power, having the effect of reducing the total noise output power for an improvement in SINAD and NF, albeit somewhat deceptively.
Calculation of SINAD from an export of the spectrum log from Spectrogram accounts for the amplitude / frequency response of the noise output, and reconciles with the measured SINAD.
Another factor that may contribute is the FFT windowing used in the software, but since neither package describes its windowing, nothing more can be said.
Fig 2 shows the display in Spectran.
The Spectrogram analysis indicates signal level of -22.7dB, noise in 2.7Hz bandwidth adjacent to the signal of -57.0dB, so a S/N of 34.3dB.
Quantity | Value | Comment |
SSG power | -124dBm | |
S/N | 34.3dB | |
ENB | 2.7Hz | |
NF | 10.9dB |
Again, the indicated Noise Figure is quite an amount better than measured with the SINAD meter. See the comments re Spectrogram, the same issues apply.
In Stage 2, the receiver is connected to an antenna pointing at the beacon at Nimmitabel on 144.413MHz.
Fig 3 shows the display in Spectrogram.
The Spectrogram analysis indicates signal level of -26dB, noise in 2.7Hz bandwidth adjacent to the signal of -53dB.
Quantity | Value | Comment |
S/N | 34.3dB | |
ENB | 2.7Hz | |
NF | 10.9dB |
Fig 4 shows the display in Spectran.
The Spectran analysis indicates signal level of -22.6dB, noise in 2.7Hz bandwidth adjacent to the signal of -56.9dB.
Quantity | Value | Comment |
S/N | 34.3dB | |
ENB | 2.7Hz | |
NF | 10.9dB |
The ambient (or external) noise level can be determined by measuring the change in noise between a known noise source and the antenna. The noise level measured in the first stage is from a known source, it is the noise in a resistor which can be calculated.
The change in noise from stage 1 to stage two can be assessed from the spectrum displays, additionally, it can be measured with a true RMS voltmeter.
Quantity | Voltmeter | Spectrogram | Spectran |
Tcold (K) | 290 | 290 | 290 |
Noise on SSG (dB) | -16.2 | -62 | -57.0 |
Noise on Antenna (dB) | -7.9 | -53 | -48.6 |
Y (dB) | 8.3 | 9.0 | 8.4 |
Ta ( K) | 14,510 | 17,430 | 14,900 |
Fa (dB) | 17.0 | 17.8 | 17.1 |
Many calculations in the above tables were performed with the following tools:
Version | Date | Description |
1.01 | 15/10/2006 | Initial. |
1.02 | ||
1.03 | ||
1.04 | ||
1.05 |
V1.01 20/02/09 09:57:11 -0700 .
© Copyright: Owen Duffy 1995, 2021. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.