1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – the magic k factor

An online expert discussing broadband RF transformers recently opined “… if you measure k, the correlation of k and performance is excellent” whatever “performance” means.

Presumably he means k as in the flux coupling coefficient of two flux coupled inductors, ie inductors with mutual inductance (meaning changing current in one inductor induces an EMF in the other inductor). k is the proportion of flux due to current in one inductor that cuts the turns of the other inductor, it is usually stated pu (per unit) but sometimes in % (per cent or per 100).

A common metric for the performance of a broadband transformer is its InsertionVSWR. Other factors might be considered, but InsertionVSWR is commonly most ranked. Note that to describe a transformer as 1:49 implicitly invokes InsertionVSWR as a measure of its performance.

One of the enemies of broadband performance is flux leakage, k less than unity. The equivalent leakage reactance is usually the main contirubutor to high frequency roll off (an increase in InsertionVSWR at high frequencies) in good designs.

Let’s explore the ‘magic’ using the calibrated model used at 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – design workup.

Above is a chart from that model showing: Continue reading 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – the magic k factor

Try this quick quiz on directional wattmeters – answers

Directional wattmeters are used in lots of ham stations, yet we see evidence in social media posts that many people do not understand them and the measurement context.

We have an RF source connected via a Bird 43 directional wattmeter with an appropriate 50Ω measurement element directly to a load resistance.

We measure the load voltage to be 100Vrms and the current to be 1Arms.

1. What is the power in the load?

100W

2. What does the directional wattmeter indicate for Pfwd?

112.5W

3. What does the directional wattmeter indicate for Prev?

12.5W

What is the implied VSWR?

2

4. Can the load power in this scenario be ‘measured’ using this instrument?

Yes, since the calibration impedance is a purely real value, measure Pfwd and Pref and calculate P=Pfwd-Prev.

Any surprises there?

Explanations to follow in the coming days.

KL7AJ’s forward and reverse power challenge

Recently on QRZ, KL7AJ opened a thread recommending his own slide presentation entitled “SWR meters make you stupid”.

After more than 100 posts, one of the participants tried to understand this diagram for the presentation.

Now there may have been some discussion at the meeting where this was presented, giving details that are missing from the slides. Continue reading KL7AJ’s forward and reverse power challenge

Try this quick quiz on directional wattmeters

Directional wattmeters are used in lots of ham stations, yet we see evidence in social media posts that many people do not understand them and the measurement context.

We have an RF source connected via a Bird 43 directional wattmeter with an appropriate 50Ω measurement element directly to a load resistance.

We measure the load voltage to be 100Vrms and the current to be 1Arms.

  1. What is the power in the load?
  2. What does the directional wattmeter indicate for Pfwd?
  3. What does the directional wattmeter indicate for Prev?
  4. What is the implied VSWR?
  5. Can the load power in this scenario be ‘measured’ using this instrument?

Get your slide rules out, jot your answers down. My answers in a day or two…

Clipsal C2025 WE issues

I set about the relatively simple task of replacing a faulty PDL GPO (general purpose outlet – a power point) with a Clipsal double GPO.

The experience might give readers cause for concern if they have Australian made Clipsal C2025 WE GPOs (pictured above) in their residence, workshop or workplace. The label “5” is an addition, the GPO does not have a part number or manufacturing batch / date on it anywhere. Continue reading Clipsal C2025 WE issues

System perspective from valve plate to antenna feed point

Introduction

The recent article Mullard QY4-400 (4-400) x 2 Class C AM plate and screen walked through design of a valve PA for a given power supply, power out etc, arriving at the required resonant load impedance.

This article walks through the design of transmitter pi coupler output, and antenna system (feed line + antenna).

Above is the result from Calculate initial load line of valve RF amplifier.

It is popular today to design the transmitter for a nominal 50+j0Ω load, then use an ‘ATU’ to transform the antenna system load to the transmitter, but in earlier days before VSWR meters were so popular, the pi coupler would simply be adjusted to achieve the desired operating point and power output. This article follows the latter path. Continue reading System perspective from valve plate to antenna feed point

1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – measurement with antenna

This article presents measurements of an EFHW antenna system using the transformer design worked up at 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – design workup and bench measurements at 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – measurement of losses.

The antenna system

Let’s take a system view, component views including bench measurements as reference above are important in qualifying components (eg acceptable Loss), but at the end of the day, the system view is very important. Whilst this section gives a VSWR perspective, it does that in the context of qualified system components.

In this article the antenna system comprises 11m of RG58A/U cable, the transformer described above and 20m of ‘radiator’ wire. This configuration should have a fundamental resonance around 7MHz and support harmonic operation at around 14, 21, and 28MHz.

Note that these type of antenna systems exhibit some amount of inharmonicity, ie the higher modes are not exact integer multiples of the fundamental resonance, there are contributions from both the ‘radiator’ wire, ‘counterpoise’ system and transformer.

Above is the VSWR plot looking into 11m of RG58A/U cable. The VSWR at the transformer jack point will be marginally higher, but this plot is typical of what might be presented to a transceiver. Continue reading 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – measurement with antenna

1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – measurement of losses

Introduction

This article presents a review of a EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core, a pack of 2 for $8 at Jaycar stores (Australia). The LO1238 is a 35x21x13mm Toroid of L15 material (µi=1500). Boxed up, it is probably safely capable of about 5W continuous dissipation.

The design is described at 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – design workup.

Implementation

Above is the internals of VK4MQ’s balun. I would not use the pink PTFE tape, the balun core is extremely low conductivity and it is doubtful the tape helps. Continue reading 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – measurement of losses

1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – design workup

Introduction

There are several articles on this site describing EFHW transformers using the Jaycar LO1238 toroid, two particularly relevant ones are:

This article presents a design workup of a EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core, a pack of 2 for $8 at Jaycar stores (Australia). The LO1238 is a 35x21x13mm Toroid of L15 material (µi=1500). Boxed up, it is probably safely capable of about 5W continuous dissipation.

I will use the meanings explained at On insertion loss.

The design was developed in a SimNEC model which models a EFHW transformer, and can be calibrated against measurements of implementations. This helps evolve the model and develop some experience for likely values for leakage inductance etc. Continue reading 1:49 EFHW transformer using a Jaycar LO1238 core – design workup