NEC requires the user to define a model structure as a set of geometry elements. It includes two powerful cards that make definition of the structure simpler and more reliable, they are the GM card for coordinate transformation and GX card for reflecting a structure in coordinate planes.
This tutorial demonstrates the use of these cards to define what might appear to be a fairly complex hypothetical NVIS antenna scenario quite simply, and more importantly, reliably. I say reliably because the logical definition of the model based on similar elements already defined, the more confident the developer can be that they are indeed similarly defined, the differences are explicit, and that they are properly connected.
Instead, we will define it with far fewer GW cards and use model symmetry, rotation and translation to define the model.
The following is a 4NEC2 card deck which runs without errors using the NEC-4.2 engine. It contains inline comments that describe what the following card does. Note that the inline comment syntax and symbol usage (SY cards) is 4NEC2 specific and may not work in other packages. Further, whilst NEC allows inline comments in this style, unfortunately it consolidates them all at the start of the file upon saving.
CM GM, GX tutorial 4NEC2 deck CE SY f=10 'frequency SY l1=3 'len of dipole leg SY a1=10 'angle of dipole leg from Z plane SY a2=15 'angle of dipole leg from Y plane SY h1=10 'height of structure above ground SY h2=0.1 'height of radials above ground SY o1=0.05 'feed offset SY r1=0.01 'dipole leg radius SY d1=10 'distance to second antenna SY l2=l1 'radial length SY n=16 'number of radials 'define basic dipole leg length and radius GW 1 50 0 0 0 l1 0 0 r1 'tilt up, out and offset it GM 0 0 0 -a2 a1 o1 o1 0 1 'define connecting link GW 2 1 o1 0 0 o1 o1 0 r1 'mirror the one leg structure GX 2 010 'mirror the two leg structure GX 4 100 'define the feed link GW 10 1 -o1 0 0 o1 0 0 r1 'raise it all to height GM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h1 1 'define mast GW 20 50 0 0 h2 0 0 h1-o1 0.01 'define radial GW 22 20 0 0 h2 l2 0 h2 r1 'replicate radials GM 0 n-1 0 0 360/n 0 0 0 22 'replicate antenna GM 100 1 0 0 60 0 d1 0 1 GE -1 LD 0 110 1 1 50 0 1 GN 2 0 0 0 13 0.005 EK EX 0 10 1 0 1 0 0 FR 0 0 0 0 f 0 EN
- That there are only 5 GW cards to define the structure of 52 conductors. We can be confident after a minimum of checking that the structure has the desired symmetry / balance, and the second antenna is indeed a faithful copy of the first.
- The first wire is defined simply along the X axis by its length and then rotated into the desired position, there is not need to define the 3D coordinates of the wire in its final position, let NEC do the calculations.
Some further exercises for the reader:
- What is the isolation(in dB) between transmitter on the left antenna and the 50Ω load inserted at the feed point of the second antenna?
- What if the load on the second antenna was matched, what is the isolation?
- What if the second antenna was parallel to the first?
- What is the difference in radiation efficiency if the 16 radials are reduced to 4?